NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 40.1x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s
- 28.8x more pipelines: 2304 vs 80
- 52x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 47x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7997 vs 170
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 1 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7997 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
- 14.7x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7997 | 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 352 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK110 | Cedar |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 1 April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 458 | 461 |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 170 mm |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |