NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 40.1x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s
- 28.8x more pipelines: 2304 vs 80
- 52x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 45.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7993 vs 175
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 vs 353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7993 vs 175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 vs 353 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7993 | 175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | M92 |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 5 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 457 | 458 |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |