NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 601 MHz
- 14.1x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 240
- 8.5x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 288.48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3804 vs 292
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 344
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2648
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2648
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 6 November 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 601 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 288.48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 vs 292 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2648 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 | 292 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 344 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12873 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2648 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK104 | R600 |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 6 November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 768 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 601 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 288.48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 7.21 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
