NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 320
- 7.7x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3835 vs 401
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 vs 320
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3262
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3835 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 122 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3835 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3262 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M96 |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 767 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |