NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 20.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 102.0 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1536
• 2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,448 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 705.616
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 13.832
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 4868
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3679
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 4868
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3679

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 745 MHz
• Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3846 vs 3516
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 160
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12520 vs 10864
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 20.654
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 3.244
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 76.158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3516 3846
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	160 418
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10864 12520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.654 39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1063.784 705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.244 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.277 13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.158 78.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6782 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6782 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3351

Compare specifications (specs)