NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 20.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1536
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,448 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 705.616
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 13.832
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3679
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 11 May 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,448 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 vs 705.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 vs 13.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 vs 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 vs 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3804 vs 3516
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 160
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12815 vs 10864
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 20.97
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 3.244
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 76.158
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 vs 3516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12815 vs 10864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 20.97 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 3.244 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 vs 76.158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 3804 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 12815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | 39.934 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | 705.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 3.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | 13.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | 78.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Place in performance rating | 762 | 764 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |