NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 20.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1536
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,448 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 705.616
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 13.832
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3679
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2,448 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 vs 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 vs 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 vs 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3797 vs 3516
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 160
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12854 vs 10864
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 20.97
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 3.244
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 76.158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3797 vs 3516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12854 vs 10864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 20.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 3.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 vs 76.158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 3797 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 12854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 11 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
| Place in performance rating | 763 | 764 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID K520 with others
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAGRID K520 vs
AMDRadeon 630
