NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus AMD FirePro W600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and AMD FirePro W600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 24 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Environ 50% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 768.0 gflops
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2519 versus 1676
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9754 versus 6185
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 17.708
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.857
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 36.592
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 93.116
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 2331
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1555
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3250
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 2331
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1555
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3250
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 13 June 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 768.0 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2519 versus 1676 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9754 versus 6185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 17.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 1.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 36.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 93.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3250 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W600
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 versus 225
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.463 versus 388.248
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 versus 225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 versus 388.248 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2519 | 1676 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 586 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9754 | 6185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 17.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 585.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 1.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 36.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 93.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3250 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD FirePro W600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 13 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 918 | 919 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 750 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 163 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1270 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
