NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 77% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 vs 1202
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 vs 3802
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 9.947
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 vs 340.824
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 0.982
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 18.773
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 23.111
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 2283
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3299
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1913
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 2283
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3299
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1913
• 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 vs 414

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 225

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2521 1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	225 239
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9809 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.761 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	388.248 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.428 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.889 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.016 23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3817 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3817 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	979 414

Compare specifications (specs)