NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 77% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 652.8 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 1202
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 3802
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 9.947
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 340.824
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 0.982
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 18.773
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 23.111
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 2283
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3299
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 1913
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 2283
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3299
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 1913
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 414
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 652.8 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 1202 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 414 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 versus 225
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 versus 225 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 1202 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 896 | 1188 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |