NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 1344 vs 320
- 6.8x better floating-point performance: 2,599 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3484 vs 405
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3302
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3302
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 1 June 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3484 vs 405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 347 vs 279
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 347 vs 279 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | ATI Radeon E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3484 | 405 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | 347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12745 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3302 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK104 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 1 June 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 717 | 720 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6700 XL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIRadeon E4690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
