AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 278
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 81.753
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 12 March 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 vs 81.753 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 2,599 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3480 vs 3141
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12737 vs 11464
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 vs 31.301
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 vs 572.795
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 vs 2.83
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 vs 26.388
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6350 vs 4042
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2221
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6350 vs 4042
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2221
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops vs 1,306 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3480 vs 3141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12737 vs 11464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 vs 31.301 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 vs 572.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 vs 2.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 vs 26.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 vs 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 vs 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 3480 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 278 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11464 | 12737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 34.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 3.038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 59.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 81.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | 6350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | 6350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 555 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 716 | 718 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 108.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 555 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6700 XL
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
ATIRadeon X1050
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
ATIRadeon X550 XTX
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
