NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 26.5x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 80
- 31.8x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 16x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3783 vs 236
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 558
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 558
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 30 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 vs 236 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 | 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 429 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 558 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK104 | RV710 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 30 September 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 779 | 763 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1310 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
