NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 601 MHz
- 17.6x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 240
- 10.6x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 288.48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3783 vs 292
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2648
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2648
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 6 November 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 601 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 288.48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 vs 292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2648 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 344 vs 332
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 344 vs 332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3783 | 292 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 344 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2648 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK104 | R600 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 6 November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 779 | 777 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 601 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 288.48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 7.21 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
