NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and ATI Mobility Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 3.2x more boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 32.1x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
• 160x more pipelines: 640 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
• 5x more memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 76.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2586 vs 34
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 204

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2586 34
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 204

Compare specifications (specs)