NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,425 gflops
• Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 500x more memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2581 vs 2527
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9739 vs 7971
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 23.168
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 2.141
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 28.29
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 47.404
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 3948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3335
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 3948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3335
• 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 881

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 914 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 217
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 373.644

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2581 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 411
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9739 7971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.396 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	373.644 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.54 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.412 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.158 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 881

Compare specifications (specs)