NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 980 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 91% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1802 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 793
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 149
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 3866
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 9.392
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 vs 157.479
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 0.864
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 16.101
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 44.77
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 1589
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3235
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3339
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 1589
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3235
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3339
• 9.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 345

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2577 793
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9744 3866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.396 9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	373.644 157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.54 0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.412 16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.158 44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 345

Compare specifications (specs)