AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 217
• Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 9744
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.54
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 39.412
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 139.158

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• 3x more core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 2106
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 40.991
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 vs 364.578
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3107
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3107
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 1201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2106 2577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	518 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14583 9744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 3350

Compare specifications (specs)