AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 914 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 42.396
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 373.644
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.54
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 39.412
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 139.158
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 4148
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 4148

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2344
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.281 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.276 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.951 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.944 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	196.307 139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358

Compare specifications (specs)