NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and AMD Radeon HD 7690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1024 vs 480
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6098 vs 909
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 454
- 15x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18636 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 January 2015 vs 25 December 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6098 vs 909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18636 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7690M
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7690M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon HD 7690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6098 | 909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18636 | 1242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon HD 7690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM206 | Thames |
Launch date | 22 January 2015 | 25 December 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 500 | 501 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1127 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |