NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 875 MHz
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 1536 vs 160
- 5.9x better floating-point performance: 1,659 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 26.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7352 vs 277
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 499 vs 202
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops vs 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7352 vs 277 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 vs 202 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7352 | 277 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 | 202 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21639 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM204 | Caicos |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 450 | 834 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 875 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |