NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon R7 A265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 825 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,659 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7358 vs 994
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 492 vs 468
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23749 vs 6925

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A265

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7358 994
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	492 468
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23749 6925

Compare specifications (specs)