NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 13x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 80
- 20.7x better floating-point performance: 1,659 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 42x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7356 vs 175
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7356 vs 175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 vs 353 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7356 | 175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 | 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23790 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3190 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | M92 |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 452 | 453 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |