NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 743 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 11.89 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 320
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 1,659 gflops vs 475.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 11.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7350 vs 660
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 743 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 11.89 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops vs 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7350 vs 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 vs 397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7350 | 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | R600 |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 450 | 375 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 743 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops | 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |