NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs ATI FireGL V8650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 19.3x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 9x more pipelines: 2880 vs 320
- 12.8x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 16.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9178 vs 550
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 688 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9178 vs 550 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650
- 248x more memory clock speed: 1736 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 597
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1736 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | ATI FireGL V8650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9178 | 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | ATI FireGL V8650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110B | R600 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 14 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $2,799 |
| Place in performance rating | 432 | 434 |
| Price now | $999.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 889 MHz | 688 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2880 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 2880 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1736 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
ATIFireGL V8650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDFirePro W7170M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDFirePro W4300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570
