AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 889 MHz
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 857.1x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 598
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.153 vs 22.384
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3679
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3353
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3679
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

• 4.8x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
• 4x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9036 vs 2809
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27085 vs 11008
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 31.528
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 vs 828.57
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 2.986
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 290.861 vs 152.484
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 3572
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 3572

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 9036
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	625 598
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11008 27085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.528 72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	828.57 1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.986 7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.153 22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.484 290.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3572 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6161 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17597 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3572 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6161 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17597 3353

Compare specifications (specs)