AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 889 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 971.4x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 598
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30250 vs 27085
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 72.677
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 22.384
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 290.861

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

• Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 112.0 GTexel / s
• Around 61% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1792
• Around 58% better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 3,584 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9036 vs 6337
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 vs 1070.209
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 6.94
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 7664
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 2340
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 7664
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 2340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 9036
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	697 598
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30250 27085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.958 72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1070.209 1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.94 7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.457 22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	436.958 290.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3353

Compare specifications (specs)