NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 19x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 30x more pipelines: 2880 vs 96
- 21x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 15.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 571
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 365
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25674 vs 8743
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 vs 571 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25674 vs 8743 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | NVIDIA Quadro 500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 | 571 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25674 | 8743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK110B | GF108 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 441 | 602 |
Price now | $999.99 | $275.14 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | 3.18 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |