NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 7.9x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 236 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1107 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1825 vs 1285
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 196 vs 59
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 2697
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3325
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 2697
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 622.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 236 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1107 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1825 vs 1285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 196 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 1122 MHz
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 48.2 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21396 vs 6532
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 1122 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21396 vs 6532 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1825 | 1285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 196 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6532 | 21396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GT200 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1060 | 1062 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $522.78 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 1296 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 48.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 236 Watt |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 141.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
SLI |