NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3335
- 3.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 vs 162
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 22 January 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 vs 162 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 1814
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 195
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 6461
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 31.613
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 vs 406.203
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 2.034
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 vs 30.251
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 107.608
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 2796
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 2796
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 1122 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 vs 1814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18734 vs 6461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 vs 31.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 vs 406.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 vs 2.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 vs 30.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 vs 107.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3686 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 6111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 673 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 18734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 73.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 792.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 4.888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 35.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GM206 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 22 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1013 | 514 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $229.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 1127 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 120 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||

