NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1015 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2261 vs 1735
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9579 vs 8255
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 3548
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2185
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 3548
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2185
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1015 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2261 vs 1735 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9579 vs 8255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2185 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 331 vs 213
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 1,127 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 331 vs 213 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2261 | 1735 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 331 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9579 | 8255 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2185 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Tropo |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 897 | 899 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 40.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |