NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2852
- 80.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 46
- 26.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 125.7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 23 November 2014 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 125.7 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5448 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.778 vs 45.905
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1285.141 vs 495.238
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.839 vs 2.365
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.347 vs 38.965
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 321.767 vs 145.794
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 1,127 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 vs 45.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 vs 495.238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 vs 2.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 vs 38.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 vs 145.794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2265 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 71.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 1285.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 5.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 75.347 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 321.767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 7037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 125.7 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 23 November 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 899 | 901 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 174.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5448 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |