NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 8.4x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 84 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2278 vs 388
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 215 vs 165
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1015
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1015

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2278 388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	215 165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 1015
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 1015

Compare specifications (specs)