NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 937 MHz
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 48% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2277 vs 1445
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 215 vs 190
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9425 vs 4212
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2197
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2197
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3502
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3502
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2277 vs 1445 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 vs 190 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9425 vs 4212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1445 | 2277 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 | 215 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4212 | 9425 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | GM108 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 904 | 905 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 48.06 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX110 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
