NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD FirePro W600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 1671
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9607 vs 6185
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 17.708
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.857
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 36.592
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 93.116
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2331
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1555
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3250
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2331
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1555
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3250
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 13 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 768.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 vs 1671 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9607 vs 6185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 17.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 vs 1.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 vs 36.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 93.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3250 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 214
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.463 vs 495.238
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 vs 495.238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD FirePro W600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 | 1671 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9607 | 6185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 17.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 585.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 1.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 36.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 93.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3250 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD FirePro W600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 13 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 913 | 916 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 163 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |