NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD FirePro W600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 750 MHz
• Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
• Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2277 vs 1671
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9425 vs 6231
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 17.708
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.857
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 36.592
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 93.116
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2331
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1555
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3250
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2331
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1555
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3250

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 215
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.463 vs 495.238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2277 1671
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	215 603
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9425 6231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 17.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 585.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 1.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 36.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 93.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1555
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3250
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1555
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3250

Compare specifications (specs)