NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 8.6 billion / sec
- 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
- 14.8x better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 76.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 17.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 131
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 213 vs 42
- 8.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 449
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1397
- 8.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 449
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 8.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 76.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 vs 131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 vs 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 42 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP108 | G84 |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 17 April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 1621 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 76.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 8.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX150 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5650
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile
