NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 14x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 140 Watt
• 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 30.505
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 35.416
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 62.69
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 3581
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3690
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 3581
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 2259
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 213
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 9584
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 495.238
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 2.365
• Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 999

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 1307

Compare specifications (specs)