NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1839 vs 636
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 128
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2172
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2172

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1839 636
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2172
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2172

Compare specifications (specs)