NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1038 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1830
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 214
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 6740
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 21.591
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 445.82
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.736
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 32.43
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 102.234
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2680
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2680
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 vs 1830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 vs 6740 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 vs 21.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 vs 445.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 vs 1.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 vs 32.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 vs 102.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 9329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP108 | GP108B |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 21 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 981 | 861 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX230 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
