NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Environ 62% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 937 MHz
- Environ 52% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1038 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 937 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 versus 1830
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 versus 214
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 versus 6740
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 21.591
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 versus 445.82
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 versus 1.736
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 versus 32.43
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 versus 102.234
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 2680
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 2680
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 versus 1830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 versus 214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 versus 6740 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 21.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 versus 445.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 versus 1.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 versus 32.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 versus 102.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 9329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GP108B |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 21 February 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 861 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 1,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

