NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce MX230 und NVIDIA GeForce MX250 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Etwa 62% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1519 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Etwa 52% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1582 MHz vs 1038 MHz
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1519 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1830
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 214
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 6740
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 21.591
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 445.82
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.736
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 32.43
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 102.234
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2680
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2680
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 vs 1830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 vs 6740 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 vs 21.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 vs 445.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 vs 1.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 vs 32.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 vs 102.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 9329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Pascal |
| Codename | GP108 | GP108B |
| Startdatum | 21 February 2019 | 21 February 2019 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 981 | 861 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1519 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,800 million | 1,800 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

