NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2423 vs 763
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 7.457
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 512.081
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 1643
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3314
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 1643
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3314
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2423 vs 763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 vs 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 vs 512.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 242
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2423 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9088 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 512.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GP108B | Broadway |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 885 | 847 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDMI 1.3a |