NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA P106-090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA P106-090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2407 vs 2343
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 31 July 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2407 vs 2343 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19027 vs 9273
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 46.992
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 535.24
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 2.64
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 44.7
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 183.725 vs 141.816
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 vs 9273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 vs 46.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 vs 535.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 vs 2.64 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 vs 44.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 183.725 vs 141.816 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA P106-090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2407 | 2343 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 101 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9273 | 19027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 86.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 1309.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 6.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 58.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 183.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA P106-090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP108B | GP106 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 31 July 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 902 | 905 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s |