NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 87% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2424 versus 763
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 7.457
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 versus 512.081
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 1643
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 3314
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 1643
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 3314
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 7 January 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2424 versus 763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 versus 512.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 384
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 versus 242
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 800 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 versus 242 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2424 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9092 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 512.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GP108B | Broadway |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 7 January 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 885 | 847 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 1,040 million |
Performance á point flottant | 800.0 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDMI 1.3a |