NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 67 Watt
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 17.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2423 vs 142
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 212
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 14 April 2004 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 67 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2423 vs 142 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2423 | 142 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Curie |
Code name | GP108B | NV40 A1 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 14 April 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 885 | 809 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 67 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 222 million |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s |