NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 771 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 375.1x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 12.2x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 28x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 119.7
- 25.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2784 vs 108.2
- 32.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 117
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 119.7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 vs 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3352
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 2784
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 3808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 3808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 119.7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 8 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 887 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
