NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon Pro 455

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon Pro 455 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 855 MHz
  • 1144.7x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
  • Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12521 vs 11291
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 4146
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1762
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 4146
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1762
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 October 2016
Core clock speed 1354 MHz vs 855 MHz
Texture fill rate 46.98 GTexel/s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 12521 vs 11291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4655 vs 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4655 vs 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 1762

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455

  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 2804
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 241
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3113 vs 2804
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 vs 241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2804
3113
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
241
705
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12521
11291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4655
4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4655
4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3359
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX350 AMD Radeon Pro 455
PassMark - G3D Mark 2804 3113
PassMark - G2D Mark 241 705
Geekbench - OpenCL 12521 11291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4655 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4655 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.484
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 573.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 148.673

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 AMD Radeon Pro 455

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 4.0
Code name GP107 Baffin
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 30 October 2016
Place in performance rating 681 671
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1468 MHz
Core clock speed 1354 MHz 855 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.879 TFLOPS
Pipelines 640 768
Pixel fill rate 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 46.98 GTexel/s 41.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 3300 million 3,000 million
Floating-point performance 1,313 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size large

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 56.06 GB/s 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0