NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon Pro 455
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon Pro 455 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 1144.7x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13447 vs 11465
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 4146
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1762
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 4146
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1762
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 41.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13447 vs 11465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1762 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 2807
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 238
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 vs 2807 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon Pro 455 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 3113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13447 | 11465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Baffin |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 690 | 692 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 41.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |