NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD FirePro W5170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD FirePro W5170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 1269.7x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 37 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2803 vs 1819
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13534 vs 8303
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 3409
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3189
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 3409
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3189
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 25 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 37 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2803 vs 1819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13534 vs 8303 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 236
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5170M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD FirePro W5170M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2803 | 1819 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 355 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13534 | 8303 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD FirePro W5170M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tropo |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 25 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 668 | 695 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireMV 2200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
