NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2509.6x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2813 vs 1082
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13548 vs 5910
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3341
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2813 vs 1082 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13548 vs 5910 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 375 vs 238
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 vs 238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2813 | 1082 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 | 375 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13548 | 5910 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Oland |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 691 | 693 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |