NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 1864.3x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12521 vs 7888
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 2097
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3127
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 2097
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12521 vs 7888 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3356
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2804 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12521 | 7888 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6862 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Oland |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | 833 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
