NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 952 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 1919.1x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 1288
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 195
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 5533
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 2053
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3577
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 2053
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3577
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 495
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 1 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 952 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 24.48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 vs 1288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 vs 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 vs 5533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3577 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 vs 495 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 1288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 5533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM108 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 654 | 1100 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 952 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 24.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |