NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 672 MHz
- 4350x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 10.8 billion / sec
- 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 478
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 91
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 2171
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 960
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2210
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2701
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 960
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2210
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2701
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 672 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 10.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 vs 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 vs 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 vs 2171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2701 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 2171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GP107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 654 | 1503 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 672 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 258.05 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |